Notes · What we build

Every approved extension in your borough, the week it is granted.

A lead board built for DeWolf Design & Build, a North London design and build firm. It reads the planning register across their boroughs, scores every approved project, and puts the ones worth quoting at the top.

The problem

The work is public. Finding it is the job

Every council publishes the extensions, loft conversions and renovations it approves. For a builder that is a list of people who have just been given permission to spend money on exactly what you do.

The catch is that it arrives as a planning register: thousands of entries, most of them irrelevant, no sense of size, and no order. Reading it properly is a job nobody has time for, so most builders keep working on referral and hope.

What we built

The board

Approved applications across Barnet, Camden, Enfield, Hackney, Haringey and Islington, scored and ranked.

The DeWolf lead board: approved planning applications scored and ranked, showing sample data

Sample data. Every address, reference and value shown is invented for this illustration.

How it decides

Scoring, with the reasoning shown

Value

What the job is worth

The size of the opportunity matters, because a full renovation and a bathroom refit are not the same job even when both are approved on the same street.

Work

What kind of work it is

Bigger kinds of work rank above smaller ones, because they mean a larger contract that one firm can take on.

Place

Fresh and local

Recent consents sit nearer the top, and a board can be worked by borough rather than as one undifferentiated list.

Then

Hot, Warm or Cool

Scores become a band rather than a number to argue with. Duplicate references are flagged, and every row keeps a link back to the public record it came from.

Why it generalises

One method, two different buyers

This is the same engine as our Multi-Unit board, pointed at a different customer. A granted consent for a residential scheme is a lending opportunity to a development finance broker and a building contract to a builder. Same public record, same scoring, entirely different sales conversation.

That is the useful part. The method is not tied to one trade: wherever a public register records the moment someone decides to spend, the same approach applies.

Honestly

What this is, and what it is not

This is a build, not a results story. The board was built and handed over; it has not yet been run as part of DeWolf's day to day sales. So there are no won contracts to report here, and we are not going to imply otherwise.

What it does show is how we approach the problem: read the public record, weigh it, rank it, and give the owner something they can work in ten minutes rather than a spreadsheet nobody opens.

Want this pointed at your market?

Book a call and we will show you what the register already holds for your patch.

Book a call